State v. McCallister

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. McCallister

904 P.2d 202, 137 Or. App. 426, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1469

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 25, 1995

DocketC9212-37432; CA A81843

StatusPublished

This text of 904 P.2d 202 (State v. McCallister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCallister, 904 P.2d 202, 137 Or. App. 426, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1469 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree, ORS 163.118, and the sentence on his conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was jointly indicted with Michael LeWayne Taylor and, after a joint trial, defendant and Taylor were found guilty of manslaughter in the first degree and unlawful use of a weapon. In Taylor’s appeal, we held that the trial court erred by admitting hearsay evidence, and we also remanded the unlawful use of a weapon conviction for resentencing. State v. Taylor, 133 Or App 503, 892 P2d 697, on recons 134 Or App 501, 895 P2d 357 (1995).

Defendant raises the same claims of error and the state concedes that the same holding should apply. We agree.

Conviction for unlawful use of a weapon affirmed and remanded for resentencing; conviction for manslaughter reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI