State v. McCall

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McCall

437 S.W.3d 821, 2014 WL 3057362, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 752

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 8, 2014

DocketNo. ED 99675

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 437 S.W.3d 821 (State v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. McCall, 437 S.W.3d 821, 2014 WL 3057362, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bryant McCall appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him as a prior and persistent offender of two counts of robbery in the first degree (counts 1 and 5), one count of attempted robbery in the first degree (count 3), three counts of armed criminal action (counts 2, 4, and 6), one count of tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree (count 7), one count of unlawful use of a weapon (count 8), and one count of resisting a lawful stop or detention (count 9).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bryant McCall appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him as a prior and persistent offender of two counts of robbery in the first degree (counts 1 and 5), one count of attempted robbery in the first degree (count 3), three counts of armed criminal action (counts 2, 4, and 6), one count of tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree (count 7), one count of unlawful use of a weapon (count 8), and one count of resisting a lawful stop or detention (count 9).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

437 S.W.3d 821, 2014 WL 3057362, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccall-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack