State v. McCADDEN
This text of 609 S.E.2d 497 (State v. McCADDEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant pled guilty to the Class C felony of statutory rape. See
Counsel appointed to represent defendant on appeal has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief. He asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California,
In accordance with Anders, we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom. Inasmuch as defendant stipulated to both his prior convictions and Prior Record Level and received the specific mitigated sentence provided for in his plea agreement, we conclude he has no remaining grounds for appeal within his limited statutory appeal of right under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(a1), (a2). Accordingly, his appeal is dismissed. See State v. Hamby,
Dismissed.
Judges HUNTER and STEELMAN concur.
Report per Rule 30(e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
609 S.E.2d 497, 168 N.C. App. 730, 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mccadden-ncctapp-2005.