State v. McBean

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McBean

886 S.W.2d 148, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487, 1994 WL 509100

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 1994·No. Nos. 63798, 65152·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Neville McBean appeals his conviction for manslaughter, in violation of former § 565.005 RSMo (1978, repealed 1984). McBean also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Neville McBean appeals his conviction for manslaughter, in violation of former § 565.005 RSMo (1978, repealed 1984). McBean also appeals from an order denying his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 80.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

State v. McBean, 886 S.W.2d 148, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487, 1994 WL 509100 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

886 S.W.2d 148 (State v. McBean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.