State v. McAlmont

2012 Ohio 4327

Opinion

[Cite as State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St.3d 162, 2012-Ohio-4327.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCALMONT, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. McAlmont, 133 Ohio St.3d 162, 2012-Ohio-4327.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell. (No. 2011-0065—Submitted September 12, 2012—Decided September 27, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clark County, No. 09-CA-21, 2010-Ohio-5879. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012-Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LANZINGER, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Gunnell, 132 Ohio St.3d 442, 2012- Ohio-3236, 973 N.E.2d 243. __________________ D. Andrew Wilson, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew Picek, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Murr, Compton, Claypool & Macbeth and Charles M. Blue, for appellee. ______________________