State v. McAfee

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. McAfee

545 S.W.3d 878

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 2018·No. No. ED 105129·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*879Michael McAfee appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of evidence or the denial of the motion for mistrial. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*879Michael McAfee appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for first-degree murder and armed criminal action. There was no error in the admission of evidence or the denial of the motion for mistrial. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. McAfee, 545 S.W.3d 878 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

545 S.W.3d 878 (State v. McAfee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related