State v. M.C.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. M.C.

661 So. 2d 377, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10668, 1995 WL 595037

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1995·No. No. 94-00335·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

The state challenges an order which directs the sealing of all court and criminal history records of M.C. Pursuant to State v. P.D. A, 618 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), we reverse that part of the order which sealed M.C.’s court records without making the necessary constitutional findings. See also State v. AL.L., 621 So.2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); State v. J.D.E., 622 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). We, however, affirm that part of the order which sealed M.C.’s criminal history record.

Accordingly, the instant cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded in part; affirmed in part.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHATLEY, Judge.

The state challenges an order which directs the sealing of all court and criminal history records of M.C. Pursuant to State v. P.D. A, 618 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), we reverse that part of the order which sealed M.C.’s court records without making the necessary constitutional findings. See also State v. AL.L., 621 So.2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); State v. J.D.E., 622 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). We, however, affirm that part of the order which sealed M.C.’s criminal history record.

Accordingly, the instant cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded in part; affirmed in part.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA, J., concur.

State v. M.C., 661 So. 2d 377, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10668, 1995 WL 595037 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

661 So. 2d 377 (State v. M.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related