State v. Mays
872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506
Opinion
Licking App. No. 2006-CA-00097, 2007-Ohio-2807. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed July 3, 2007:
“May a police officer who witnesses a motorist cross a right white edge line and without any further evidence of erratic driving or that the crossing was done in an unsafe manner make a constitutional stop of the motorist?”
The conflict case is State v. Phillips, Logan App. No. 8-04-25, 2006-Ohio-6338.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mays, 872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2007).
872 N.E.2d 949 (State v. Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McEldowney, 06-Ca-138 (12-14-2007)
2007 Ohio 6690 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)