State v. Mays

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Mays

872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 29, 2007

Docket2007-1302

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 872 N.E.2d 949 (State v. Mays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mays, 872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Licking App. No. 2006-CA-00097, 2007-Ohio-2807. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed July 3, 2007:

“May a police officer who witnesses a motorist cross a right white edge line and without any further evidence of erratic driving or that the crossing was done in an unsafe manner make a constitutional stop of the motorist?”

Cupp, J., not participating.

The conflict case is State v. Phillips, Logan App. No. 8-04-25, 2006-Ohio-6338.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Licking App. No. 2006-CA-00097, 2007-Ohio-2807. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed July 3, 2007:

“May a police officer who witnesses a motorist cross a right white edge line and without any further evidence of erratic driving or that the crossing was done in an unsafe manner make a constitutional stop of the motorist?”

Cupp, J., not participating.

The conflict case is State v. Phillips, Logan App. No. 8-04-25, 2006-Ohio-6338.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mays-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack