State v. Mays

872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 2007·No. 2007-1302·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Licking App. No. 2006-CA-00097, 2007-Ohio-2807. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed July 3, 2007:

“May a police officer who witnesses a motorist cross a right white edge line and without any further evidence of erratic driving or that the crossing was done in an unsafe manner make a constitutional stop of the motorist?”

Cupp, J., not participating.

The conflict case is State v. Phillips, Logan App. No. 8-04-25, 2006-Ohio-6338.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mays, 872 N.E.2d 949, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1506 (Ohio 2007).

872 N.E.2d 949 (State v. Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McEldowney, 06-Ca-138 (12-14-2007)
2007 Ohio 6690 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)