State v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Mayo

573 So. 2d 1146, 1991 La. LEXIS 347, 1991 WL 15343

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 5, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-0069

StatusPublished

This text of 573 So. 2d 1146 (State v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mayo, 573 So. 2d 1146, 1991 La. LEXIS 347, 1991 WL 15343 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Mayo, Anthony; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 274-778.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Mayo, Anthony; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 274-778.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 1146, 1991 La. LEXIS 347, 1991 WL 15343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mayo-la-1991.