State v. Maynard

29 Ohio Law Rep. 68
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 29, 1964
Docket38703; 38704; 38705; 38706
StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ohio Law Rep. 68 (State v. Maynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maynard, 29 Ohio Law Rep. 68 (Ohio Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

Certified by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

O’Neill, Judge.

The arrest and prosecution of a person for violation of Section 3773.24, Revised Code (Sunday Closing Law), can be caused by two methods: (1) by filing an affidavit with a judge or clerk of a court of record or with a magistrate and (2) by filing an affidavit with the prosecuting attorney or attorney charged by law with the prosecution for the offense, who, in turn, shall file a complaint. (Section 2935.09, Revised Code.)

Judgments affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., concurring in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ohio Law Rep. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maynard-ohioctapp-1964.