State v. Maybin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Maybin

241 S.W.3d 455, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1752, 2007 WL 4481526

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2007

DocketWD 67765

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 241 S.W.3d 455 (State v. Maybin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Maybin, 241 S.W.3d 455, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1752, 2007 WL 4481526 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brent Maybin appeals from his conviction for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action. He contends the trial court plainly erred in allowing a police officer to testify about the general conduct of robbery victims. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a *456 published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brent Maybin appeals from his conviction for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action. He contends the trial court plainly erred in allowing a police officer to testify about the general conduct of robbery victims. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a *456 published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.W.3d 455, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1752, 2007 WL 4481526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maybin-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack