State v. May
3 S.C.L. 160
This text of 3 S.C.L. 160 (State v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. May, 3 S.C.L. 160 (S.C. 1802).
Opinion
The judgment must be arrested.- The offence is-not charged with sufficient certainty. The words, “ or such other person,” &c., ought not have been omitted. For any thing that appears on the face of the indictment, the party might be innocent of any offence against the act, and yet be guilty of the offencecharged in the indictment.
Judgment arrested.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 S.C.L. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-may-sc-1802.