State v. May

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. May

152 S.E.2d 72, 269 N.C. 300, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1067

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 20, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 S.E.2d 72 (State v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. May, 152 S.E.2d 72, 269 N.C. 300, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1067 (N.C. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

Defendant in this action was indicted and tried at the same time and upon the same bill of indictment as Jerry Arnold Fuqua (State v. Fuqua). The decisive facts in the instant case and in State v. Fuqua are the same. Upon authority of State v. Fuqua, ante 223, and cases therein cited, we hold that the confession made' by defendant to officer Cook was involuntary. Since it was error to admit the confession into evidence, there must be a

New trial.’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.

Defendant in this action was indicted and tried at the same time and upon the same bill of indictment as Jerry Arnold Fuqua (State v. Fuqua). The decisive facts in the instant case and in State v. Fuqua are the same. Upon authority of State v. Fuqua, ante 223, and cases therein cited, we hold that the confession made' by defendant to officer Cook was involuntary. Since it was error to admit the confession into evidence, there must be a

New trial.’

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.E.2d 72, 269 N.C. 300, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-may-nc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack