State v. May
152 S.E.2d 72, 269 N.C. 300, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1067
Opinion
Defendant in this action was indicted and tried at the same time and upon the same bill of indictment as Jerry Arnold Fuqua (State v. Fuqua). The decisive facts in the instant case and in State v. Fuqua are the same. Upon authority of State v. Fuqua, ante 223, and cases therein cited, we hold that the confession made' by defendant to officer Cook was involuntary. Since it was error to admit the confession into evidence, there must be a
New trial.’
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. May, 152 S.E.2d 72, 269 N.C. 300, 1967 N.C. LEXIS 1067 (N.C. 1967).
152 S.E.2d 72 (State v. May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hillard v. State
392 A.2d 1181 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1978)