State v. Maxwell

936 S.W.2d 869, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1, 1997 WL 3354
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 7, 1997
DocketNo. 66814
StatusPublished

This text of 936 S.W.2d 869 (State v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Maxwell, 936 S.W.2d 869, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1, 1997 WL 3354 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Michael Maxwell, appeals the judgment of conviction for delivery of a con-troEed substance, RSMo § 195.211 (Cum. Supp.1990), entered by the Circuit Court of Ralls County after a jury trial.1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gaines
807 S.W.2d 678 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
936 S.W.2d 869, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1, 1997 WL 3354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maxwell-moctapp-1997.