State v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Maxwell

594 So. 2d 287, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 96, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 178, 1992 WL 18577

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1992

DocketNo. 77699

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 287 (State v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Maxwell, 594 So. 2d 287, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 96, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 178, 1992 WL 18577 (Fla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review Maxwell v. State, 576 So.2d 367 (Pla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decisions in Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), and Brown v. State, 559 So.2d 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.Const.

This Court resolved the conflict in our decision in Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992), by holding that, in the case of multiple probation violations, the sentences may be bumped one cell or guidelines range for each violation. Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand the case for disposition consistent with our opinion in Williams.

It is ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI