State v. Max

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Max

510 S.W.3d 359, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 390, 2017 WL 410235

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2017·No. No. ED 103428·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brendan W. Max appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for two counts of child molestation in the first degree. Finding no plain error with respect to the challenged trial testimony from three witnesses and no abuse of discretion in the exclusion of an additional statement, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, [360] setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brendan W. Max appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for two counts of child molestation in the first degree. Finding no plain error with respect to the challenged trial testimony from three witnesses and no abuse of discretion in the exclusion of an additional statement, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, [360] setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Max, 510 S.W.3d 359, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 390, 2017 WL 410235 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

510 S.W.3d 359 (State v. Max) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.