State v. Maurice M.

980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 408
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 23, 2009·No. SC 18454·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 1 (AC 29557), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly hold that there was sufficient evidence that the defendant violated his probation by committing the offense of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1)?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Maurice M., 980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 408 (Colo. 2009).

980 A.2d 913 (State v. Maurice M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Maurice M.
31 A.3d 1063 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)