State v. Maurice M.
980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 408
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 23, 2009
DocketSC 18454
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 980 A.2d 913 (State v. Maurice M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Maurice M., 980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 408 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 1 (AC 29557), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly hold that there was sufficient evidence that the defendant violated his probation by committing the offense of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Maurice M.
31 A.3d 1063 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
980 A.2d 913, 293 Conn. 926, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maurice-m-conn-2009.