State v. MAURICE L.
This text of 941 A.2d 1007 (State v. MAURICE L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
MAURICE L.[*]
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
*1008 DiPENTIMA, McLACHLAN and GRUENDEL, Js.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOTES
[*] In accordance with the spirit and intent of General Statutes § 46b-I42 (b) and Practice Book § 79-3, the names of the parties involved in this appeal are not disclosed. The records and papers of this case shall be open for inspection only to persons having a proper interest therein and upon order of the Appellate Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
941 A.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maurice-l-connappct-2008.