State v. Maughan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Maughan

487 P.3d 880, 312 Or. App. 251

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 9, 2021

DocketA171305

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 487 P.3d 880 (State v. Maughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Maughan, 487 P.3d 880, 312 Or. App. 251 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted May 21, affirmed June 9, petition for review denied October 10, 2021 (368 Or 638)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CASSANDRA ELAINE MAUGHAN, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 19CR19491; A171305 487 P3d 880

Jonathan R. Hill, Judge. (Judgment) Richard Baldwin, Senior Judge. (Supplemental Judgment) Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kristin A. Carveth, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jon Zunkel-deCoursey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 252 State v. Maughan

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of robbery and theft offenses, and felon in possession of a firearm. She appeals the judgment of conviction and the supplemental judgment imposing $574.71 in restitution. We reject her challenge to the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment of acquit- tal on the robbery and theft charges. We also reject her restitution argument. We rejected her accomplice’s same argument in State v. Buswell, 308 Or App 389, 479 P3d 341 (2021). Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted May 21, affirmed June 9, petition for review denied October 10, 2021 (368 Or 638)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CASSANDRA ELAINE MAUGHAN, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 19CR19491; A171305 487 P3d 880

Jonathan R. Hill, Judge. (Judgment) Richard Baldwin, Senior Judge. (Supplemental Judgment) Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kristin A. Carveth, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jon Zunkel-deCoursey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 252 State v. Maughan

PER CURIAM Defendant was convicted of robbery and theft offenses, and felon in possession of a firearm. She appeals the judgment of conviction and the supplemental judgment imposing $574.71 in restitution. We reject her challenge to the trial court’s denial of her motion for judgment of acquit- tal on the robbery and theft charges. We also reject her restitution argument. We rejected her accomplice’s same argument in State v. Buswell, 308 Or App 389, 479 P3d 341 (2021). Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 P.3d 880, 312 Or. App. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maughan-orctapp-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack