State v. Maugeri
This text of 570 So. 2d 1153 (State v. Maugeri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Michael MAUGERI, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard F. Rendina, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
LETTS, Judge.
This cause is affirmed on the authority of State v. Anders, 560 So.2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
Notwithstanding our decision here, we are not unaware of the question we certified in Hunter v. State, 531 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), nearly two years ago, as yet unanswered. We, therefore, certify the question again adding the additional language which we emphasize:
DOES AN AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 893.135(4) AS AMENDED, WHEREBY A CONVICTED DRUG TRAFFICKER WILL RECEIVE A SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED SENTENCE IN EXCHANGE FOR SETTING UP NEW DRUG DEALS, VIOLATE THE HOLDING IN STATE V. GLOSSON, 462 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1985)?
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY J., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
570 So. 2d 1153, 1990 WL 205490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maugeri-fladistctapp-1990.