State v. Matuu

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Matuu. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Haw. 510
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2018·No. SCWC-16-0000571·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000571 27-FEB-2018 09:35 AM

SCWC-16-0000571

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DEAN VICTOR MATUU, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000571; CR. NO. 15-1-0128)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Dean Victor Matuu’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 16, 2018, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 27, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Matuu, (haw 2018).

State v. Matuu (State v. Matuu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.