State v. Matthews
189 So. 3d 1076, 2014 WL 7776709
Opinions
[tThe State seeks review of the trial court’s October 16, 2014 denial of the State’s motion to compel testimony under grant of use and derivative use immunity pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 439.1. The writ is denied.
WRIT DENIED.
LEDET, J., dissents with reasons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Matthews, 189 So. 3d 1076, 2014 WL 7776709 (La. Ct. App. 2014).
189 So. 3d 1076 (State v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Malloy v. Hogan
378 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
378 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Kastigar v. United States
406 U.S. 441 (Supreme Court, 1972)
In Re Parker
357 So. 2d 508 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1978)
State v. Edmondson
714 So. 2d 1233 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1998)
State v. Foster
845 So. 2d 393 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)