State v. Matthews

23 So. 3d 898, 2009 La. LEXIS 3525
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 18, 2009·No. No. 2009-KP-4193·Published

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 10-99-638; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KW 2163.

GRANTED. The order of the court of appeal directing the district court to conduct a hearing solely on Relator’s Brady claim is vacated. Relator alleges that the State did not turn over to the defense a statement in which a witness purportedly identified another person as the shooter. In light of the fact that Relator’s own statement revealed that he participated in the robbery in which the victim was shot and killed, the State’s statement could not satisfy the materiality standard of Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 115 S.Ct. 1555, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995), because it would not absolve Relator of the crime of which he was convicted.

/s/Marcus R. Clark Justice, Louisiana Supreme Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Matthews, 23 So. 3d 898, 2009 La. LEXIS 3525 (La. 2009).

23 So. 3d 898 (State v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kyles v. Whitley
514 U.S. 419 (Supreme Court, 1995)