State v. Matthew Aaron Juntunen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 1, 2006
Docket10-05-00105-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Matthew Aaron Juntunen (State v. Matthew Aaron Juntunen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Matthew Aaron Juntunen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-05-00101-CR through 10-05-00117-CR

The State of Texas,

                                                                      Appellant

 v.

Rebekah Faith Stanley, ET AL.

                                                                      Appellees


From the County Court at Law

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2004-3921-CR1 through 2004-3933-CR1

and Nos. 2004-3935-CR1 through 2004-3938-CR1

MEMORANDUM  Opinion


          The State has filed motions to dismiss these seventeen appeals under Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a); McClain v. State, 17 S.W.3d 310, 311 (Tex. App.CWaco 2000, no pet.) (per curiam).  We have not issued decisions in these appeals since the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded them to this Court for further proceedings.  See State v. Stanley, No. PD-1393-05, 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1816 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 20, 2006).  The Clerk of this Court has sent duplicate copies of the motions to the trial court clerk.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a); McClain, 17 S.W.3d at 311.  None of the Appellees has filed a response.  Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Vance, and

Justice Reyna

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 1, 2006

Do not publish

[CR25]

e dismiss them.  See In re D.W., 249 S.W.3d 625, 631 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2008), pet. denied per curiam, 260 S.W.3d 462 (Tex. 2008); In re E.A.R., 201 S.W.3d 813, 814 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.).

We affirm the trial court’s order of termination.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed July 13, 2011

[CV06]


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stanley
201 S.W.3d 754 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
McClain v. State
17 S.W.3d 310 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children
249 S.W.3d 625 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
In the Interest of E.A.R.
201 S.W.3d 813 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Matthew Aaron Juntunen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-matthew-aaron-juntunen-texapp-2006.