State v. Matt
669 P.2d 840, 64 Or. App. 718, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3783
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 28, 1983
DocketC82-08-36733; CA A27414
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 669 P.2d 840 (State v. Matt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Matt, 669 P.2d 840, 64 Or. App. 718, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3783 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of arson in the first degree and of conspiracy to commit the same arson. He contends he may not be convicted of both. ORS 161.485(3) provides:
“A person shall not be convicted on the basis of the same course of conduct of both the actual commission of an offense and an attempt to commit that offense or solicitation of that offense or conspiracy to commit that offense.”
Defendant is correct, and we reverse and remand for entry of a new judgment.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. McNamer
722 P.2d 51 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
669 P.2d 840, 64 Or. App. 718, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-matt-orctapp-1983.