State v. Matt
669 P.2d 840, 64 Or. App. 718, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3783
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 28, 1983·No. C82-08-36733; CA A27414·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of arson in the first degree and of conspiracy to commit the same arson. He contends he may not be convicted of both. ORS 161.485(3) provides:
“A person shall not be convicted on the basis of the same course of conduct of both the actual commission of an offense and an attempt to commit that offense or solicitation of that offense or conspiracy to commit that offense.”
Defendant is correct, and we reverse and remand for entry of a new judgment.1
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Matt, 669 P.2d 840, 64 Or. App. 718, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3783 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
669 P.2d 840 (State v. Matt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McNamer
722 P.2d 51 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)