State v. Mathis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mathis

285 S.W.3d 434, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 944, 2009 WL 1748710

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mathis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1302 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 2009·No. WD 69052·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

John Mathis appeals his convictions of voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. He complains on appeal about the admission of the medical examiner’s testimony.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

John Mathis appeals his convictions of voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. He complains on appeal about the admission of the medical examiner’s testimony.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Mathis, 285 S.W.3d 434, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 944, 2009 WL 1748710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

285 S.W.3d 434 (State v. Mathis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.