State v. Mathis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mathis

285 S.W.3d 434, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 944, 2009 WL 1748710

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 2009

DocketWD 69052

StatusPublished

This text of 285 S.W.3d 434 (State v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mathis, 285 S.W.3d 434, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 944, 2009 WL 1748710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

John Mathis appeals his convictions of voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. He complains on appeal about the admission of the medical examiner’s testimony.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

John Mathis appeals his convictions of voluntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. He complains on appeal about the admission of the medical examiner’s testimony.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.W.3d 434, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 944, 2009 WL 1748710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mathis-moctapp-2009.