State v. Mathews
541 P.2d 831, 23 Or. App. 162
Opinion
On petition for reconsideration defendant correctly points out that our opinion did not deal with one assignment of error — his contention that his motion for directed verdict should have been granted because there was no evidence showing knowledge on his part that the property in question was stolen. We find that there was.
Former opinion adhered to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mathews, 541 P.2d 831, 23 Or. App. 162 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).
541 P.2d 831 (State v. Mathews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jones
764 P.2d 978 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)