State v. Matheson
896 So. 2d 748, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 133, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 487205
Opinion
We initially accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, to review Matheson v. State, 870 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), based on express and direct conflict with Vetter v. State, 395 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Matheson, 896 So. 2d 748, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 133, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 487205 (Fla. 2005).
896 So. 2d 748 (State v. Matheson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frost v. State
53 So. 3d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Rehm v. State
931 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Tanner
915 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)