State v. Matheson

896 So. 2d 748, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 133, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 487205
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 2005
DocketNo. SC04-490
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 896 So. 2d 748 (State v. Matheson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Matheson, 896 So. 2d 748, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 133, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 487205 (Fla. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, to review Matheson v. State, 870 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), based on express and direct conflict with Vetter v. State, 395 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, and BELL, JJ., concur. CANTERO, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frost v. State
53 So. 3d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Rehm v. State
931 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Tanner
915 So. 2d 762 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 So. 2d 748, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 133, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 381, 2005 WL 487205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-matheson-fla-2005.