State v. Matassa
71 So. 190, 138 La. 1079
This text of 71 So. 190 (State v. Matassa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Matassa, 71 So. 190, 138 La. 1079 (La. 1916).
Opinion
“Counsel for defendant excepts and reserves a bill.”
But no bill of exceptions was filed.
“A notation by the clerk of court in a criminal case that the defendant excepted and reserved a bill cannot be considered a ‘bill of exceptions.’ ” State v. Latino, 138 La. 14, 69 South. 857; State v. Miller, 138 La. 373, 70 South. 330, and authorities therein cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Latino
69 So. 857 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
State v. Miller
70 So. 330 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 So. 190, 138 La. 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-matassa-la-1916.