State v. Mastropetre

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Mastropetre

373 A.2d 1210, 173 Conn. 758

DecidedJune 7, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 373 A.2d 1210 (State v. Mastropetre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mastropetre, 373 A.2d 1210, 173 Conn. 758 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the state, on or before July 15, 1977, designate which, if any, additional parts of the transcript it deems necessary to include in the record on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the state, on or before July 15, 1977, designate which, if any, additional parts of the transcript it deems necessary to include in the record on appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

373 A.2d 1210, 173 Conn. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mastropetre-conn-1977.