State v. Mastropetre

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Mastropetre

373 A.2d 1210, 173 Conn. 758

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 7, 1977·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the state, on or before July 15, 1977, designate which, if any, additional parts of the transcript it deems necessary to include in the record on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the state, on or before July 15, 1977, designate which, if any, additional parts of the transcript it deems necessary to include in the record on appeal.

State v. Mastropetre, 373 A.2d 1210, 173 Conn. 758 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

373 A.2d 1210 (State v. Mastropetre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.