State v. Mastro

991 A.2d 227, 201 N.J. 437, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 310
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 5, 2010·No. A-102 September Term 2008, 064058·Published

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, and the parties having raised for the first time on appeal to this Court questions regarding the plea agreement, it is hereby

ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Division for scheduling on a plenary calendar to address whether the parties entered into a valid plea agreement and, if so, whether the sentence imposed was in accord with that agreement and controlling case law. See State v. John Baylass, 114 N.J. 169, 553 A.2d 326 (1989). Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mastro, 991 A.2d 227, 201 N.J. 437, 2010 N.J. LEXIS 310 (N.J. 2010).

991 A.2d 227 (State v. Mastro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Baylass
553 A.2d 326 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1989)