State v. Mast

819 P.2d 1392, 109 Or. App. 485, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1611
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 30, 1991·No. C890525CR; CA A62368·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of driving while suspended, a class C felony, and was placed on five years probation. Subsequently, his probation was revoked. There were three alleged violations: (1) he failed to abide by certain directions of his probation officer; (2) he changed his residence without permission; and (3) he consumed alcoholic liquor. The court discussed all three allegations as bases for revoking defendant’s probation. Defendant appeals.

The state points out that abstaining from alcohol was not a condition of defendant’s probation, and it concedes that revoking the probation on that ground would have been a mistake. Because it is unclear whether the consumption of alcohol was a basis for revoking the probation, we remand for reconsideration.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mast, 819 P.2d 1392, 109 Or. App. 485, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1611 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

819 P.2d 1392 (State v. Mast) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moghadas
333 Or. App. 103 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2024)
State v. Wittkopp
331 Or. App. 794 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2024)
State v. Dowty
452 P.3d 983 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2019)
State v. Rivera-Waddle
379 P.3d 820 (Lane County Circuit Court, Oregon, 2016)