State v. Massey, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004)
This text of 2004 Ohio 3257 (State v. Massey, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 3} Subsequently, on August 25, 1998, appellant filed a Motion for Super Shock Probation pursuant to R.C.
{¶ 4} After appellant failed to report to her probation officer and failed to pay restitution, the trial court revoked her community control sanctions, and reinstated the two year term of imprisonment via Judgment Entry filed September 29, 2003. On September 30, 2003, appellant filed a Motion to Waive Costs, which the trial court denied via Judgment Entry filed October 2, 2003. Appellant also filed a Motion to Vacate Order of Garnishment, which the trial court also denied via Judgment Entry filed October 15, 2003.
{¶ 5} It is from the October 2, 2003, and October 15, 2003 Judgment Entries appellant appeals, raising the following assignments of error:
{¶ 6} "I. The trial court erred in failing to waive court costs where the defendant filed an uncontested affidavit of indigency.
{¶ 7} "II. The trial court erred in failing to waive court costs by means of vacating the order of garnishment where the defendant is indigent."
Hoffman, P.J., Farmer, J. and Edwards, J. concur.
For the reason stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the judgments of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas are reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and the law. Costs assessed to appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2004 Ohio 3257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-massey-unpublished-decision-6-21-2004-ohioctapp-2004.