State v. Massey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Massey

293 S.E.2d 436, 278 S.C. 12, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 450

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Massey. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 S.C. 213 →

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 9, 1982·No. 21606·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He appealed from his conviction. This Court remanded the case to the lower court for a determination of whether appellant waived his right to counsel knowingly and intelligently. State v. Massey, 284 S. E. (2d) 781 (S. C. 1981).

By order dated March 24,1982, the lower court found, after conducting a hearing, that appellant’s request to proceed pro se at trial constituted a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. Appellant has not appealed from this order.

The lower court’s order stands as the final order in this case; therefore we dismiss appellant’s appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. He appealed from his conviction. This Court remanded the case to the lower court for a determination of whether appellant waived his right to counsel knowingly and intelligently. State v. Massey, 284 S. E. (2d) 781 (S. C. 1981).

By order dated March 24,1982, the lower court found, after conducting a hearing, that appellant’s request to proceed pro se at trial constituted a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. Appellant has not appealed from this order.

The lower court’s order stands as the final order in this case; therefore we dismiss appellant’s appeal.

State v. Massey, 293 S.E.2d 436, 278 S.C. 12, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 450 (S.C. 1982).

Pincite

293 S.E.2d 436 (State v. Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related