State v. Massey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Massey

938 S.W.2d 294, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 1997 WL 28949

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Massey. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 475 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 28, 1997·No. Nos. 68726, 70179·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant was found guilty of illegal possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to twelve years.

On direct appeal, defendant raises two plain error points, one point concerning a Batson issue, and one point involving sentencing. In addition, he raises three points concerning denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The trial court’s judgment on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.

The trial court’s judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant was found guilty of illegal possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to twelve years.

On direct appeal, defendant raises two plain error points, one point concerning a Batson issue, and one point involving sentencing. In addition, he raises three points concerning denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The trial court’s judgment on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.

The trial court’s judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Massey, 938 S.W.2d 294, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 106, 1997 WL 28949 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

938 S.W.2d 294 (State v. Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.