State v. Mason

73 S.W.3d 637, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2002 WL 109406
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mason. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 129
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 29, 2002·No. No. ED 79251·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Avery Mason (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of his conviction of first-degree burglary, first-degree assault, and third-degree assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that a reasonable juror could have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo.banc 1993). We also find that the trial court did not err in its instructions to the jury. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mason, 73 S.W.3d 637, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2002 WL 109406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

73 S.W.3d 637 (State v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Grim
854 S.W.2d 403 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1993)