State v. Mason

68 So. 3d 513, 2011 La. LEXIS 1979
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mason. Read the opinion of the Court — 68 So. 3d 513
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided August 29, 2011·No. No. 2011-KK-1866·Published

Opinion

IN RE: State of Louisiana;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. 3, No. 265,550; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 46,-906-KW.

Writ granted. Given counsel’s initial admission that race was a motivating factor in the exercise of his peremptory challenges, the district court abused its discretion in determining that counsel’s subsequent attempt to set forth racially neutral reasons for his decisions, with respect to prospective jurors Michelle Blake and Mary Cope, was not pretextual. The ruling of the district court denying the State’s Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42, 112 S.Ct. 2348, 120 L.Ed.2d 33 (1992) challenge to prospective jurors Michelle Blake and Mary Cope is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court for re-seating of these two prospective jurors and for all further proceedings.

JOHNSON, J., would deny. KNOLL, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mason, 68 So. 3d 513, 2011 La. LEXIS 1979 (La. 2011).

68 So. 3d 513 (State v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia v. McCollum
505 U.S. 42 (Supreme Court, 1992)