State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)
2004 Ohio 5297
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2004·No. Case No. 2004-T-0070.·Unpublished·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
{¶ 2} It is well-established that the denial of a motion for judicial release is not a final appealable order. State v.Singh (2001),
{¶ 3} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, due to lack of a final appealable order.
{¶ 4} Appeal dismissed.
Christley, J., Rice, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004), 2004 Ohio 5297 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
2004 Ohio 5297 (State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Christner
2012 Ohio 4790 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Cody
2011 Ohio 2289 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Swingle, Ct2007-0057 (5-6-2008)
2008 Ohio 2214 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Bronston, 2007ca00100 (3-17-2008)
2008 Ohio 1246 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Bennett, Unpublished Decision (5-31-2006)
2006 Ohio 2812 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)