State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)

2004 Ohio 5297

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 30, 2004

DocketCase No. 2004-T-0070.

StatusUnpublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2004 Ohio 5297 (State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Masko, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2004), 2004 Ohio 5297 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION {¶ 1} On June 18, 2004, appellant, Edward H. Masko, filed a notice of appeal from a May 20, 2004 judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas. In that judgment, the trial court dismissed appellant's motion for judicial release as being premature.

{¶ 2} It is well-established that the denial of a motion for judicial release is not a final appealable order. State v.Singh (2001), 146 Ohio App.3d 38; State v. Lawson, 10th Dist. No. 02AP-148, 2002-Ohio-3329; State v. Greene, 2nd Dist. No. 02-CA-17, 2002-Ohio-2595.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, due to lack of a final appealable order.

{¶ 4} Appeal dismissed.

Christley, J., Rice, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI