State v. Maschinot

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Maschinot

82 P.3d 641, 191 Or. App. 338, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 2

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJanuary 7, 2004

Docket03MH086; A121543

StatusPublished

This text of 82 P.3d 641 (State v. Maschinot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Maschinot, 82 P.3d 641, 191 Or. App. 338, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 2 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of involuntary commitment that was based on a finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A). She argues that the state failed to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that she is dangerous to herself. The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support a finding that appellant is dangerous to herself. We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of involuntary commitment that was based on a finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A). She argues that the state failed to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that she is dangerous to herself. The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support a finding that appellant is dangerous to herself. We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 P.3d 641, 191 Or. App. 338, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-maschinot-orctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack