State v. Maschinot

82 P.3d 641, 191 Or. App. 338, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 2
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 7, 2004·No. 03MH086; A121543·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of involuntary commitment that was based on a finding that, because of a mental disorder, she is dangerous to herself. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A). She argues that the state failed to demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that she is dangerous to herself. The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support a finding that appellant is dangerous to herself. We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Maschinot, 82 P.3d 641, 191 Or. App. 338, 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 2 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).

82 P.3d 641 (State v. Maschinot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005