State v. Martinez
Opinion
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
JANUARY 21, 2022
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 21
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Wayne Herbert Martinez, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210207
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Paul E. Jensen, Assistant State’s Attorney, Mandan, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Martinez
No. 20210207
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Wayne Herbert Martinez appeals from a criminal judgment in which he was found guilty of aggravated assault. Martinez argues his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. Martinez did not move to dismiss the criminal complaint. A defendant who fails to move to dismiss based on a speedy trial violation and submits to trial forfeits their claim asserting a violation of their right to a speedy trial. See State v. Jensen, 2021 ND 119, ¶¶ 14-17, 962 N.W.2d 393; State v. Hamre, 2019 ND 86, ¶¶ 6, 14-15, 924 N.W.2d 776; Koenig v. State, 2018 ND 59, ¶¶ 2, 14-24, 907 N.W.2d 344. After a review of the arguments properly presented on appeal, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2022 ND 21 (State v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.