State v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

State v. Martin

50 Tenn. 487, 3 Heisk. 487, 1872 Tenn. LEXIS 21

Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 1872·Published

Opinion

NiCHOLSON, C. J.,

delivered the opinion, holding that it was error to arrest the judgment. The act of 1859-[488]*48860, c. 81, s. 4, makes tlie sale of liquors without oath, &c., indictable. The act of 1867-8, c. 56, rejieals sec. 7 of the act of 1859-60, as to inspectors, but does not repeal the 4th section of that act.

Judgment reversed, and remanded to the court below to execute the judgment entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NiCHOLSON, C. J.,

delivered the opinion, holding that it was error to arrest the judgment. The act of 1859-[488]*48860, c. 81, s. 4, makes tlie sale of liquors without oath, &c., indictable. The act of 1867-8, c. 56, rejieals sec. 7 of the act of 1859-60, as to inspectors, but does not repeal the 4th section of that act.

Judgment reversed, and remanded to the court below to execute the judgment entered.

State v. Martin, 50 Tenn. 487, 3 Heisk. 487, 1872 Tenn. LEXIS 21 (Tenn. 1872).

Pincite

50 Tenn. 487 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.