State v. Martin
395 P.3d 65, 285 Or. App. 748, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 659
Opinion
Defendant appeals after she was removed from drug court and sentenced to 36 months’ incarceration. We write only to note that, to the extent that her appeal challenges the sentence imposed by the court, the claim is not reviewable under ORS 138.222(2)(d). See State v. Silsby, 282 Or App 104, 386 P3d 172 (2016), rev den, 360 Or 752 (2017). We reject without discussion defendant’s remaining arguments.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Martin, 395 P.3d 65, 285 Or. App. 748, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 659 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).
395 P.3d 65 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Silsby
386 P.3d 172 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2016)