State v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Martin

395 P.3d 65, 285 Or. App. 748, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 659

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 24, 2017

DocketC130336CR; A158425

StatusPublished

This text of 395 P.3d 65 (State v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Martin, 395 P.3d 65, 285 Or. App. 748, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 659 (Or. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals after she was removed from drug court and sentenced to 36 months’ incarceration. We write only to note that, to the extent that her appeal challenges the sentence imposed by the court, the claim is not reviewable under ORS 138.222(2)(d). See State v. Silsby, 282 Or App 104, 386 P3d 172 (2016), rev den, 360 Or 752 (2017). We reject without discussion defendant’s remaining arguments.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals after she was removed from drug court and sentenced to 36 months’ incarceration. We write only to note that, to the extent that her appeal challenges the sentence imposed by the court, the claim is not reviewable under ORS 138.222(2)(d). See State v. Silsby, 282 Or App 104, 386 P3d 172 (2016), rev den, 360 Or 752 (2017). We reject without discussion defendant’s remaining arguments.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

395 P.3d 65, 285 Or. App. 748, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martin-orctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack