Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State v. Martin

State v. Martin

178 S.E.2d 39, 10 N.C. App. 189, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1234
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 N.C. App. 532 →
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 16, 1970·No. No. 7010SC609·Published

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The court-appointed attorney for the defendant, with candor and frankness, presents the record for review and states that he is unable to designate any error sufficient to warrant a new trial.

We have reviewed the record in this case and find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges Britt and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Martin, 178 S.E.2d 39, 10 N.C. App. 189, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1234 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

178 S.E.2d 39 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.