State v. . Martin
40 S.E.2d 614, 227 N.C. 108, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 364
Opinion
We have carefully considered all the defendant’s exceptions and they are without merit. Moreover, a careful examination of the entire record leads us to the conclusion that the defendant has been given a fair and impartial trial, free from error. Every contention of the defendant was given in his Honor’s charge to the jury. A charge in which the defendant admits there is no error and to which he entered no exception.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Martin, 40 S.E.2d 614, 227 N.C. 108, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 364 (N.C. 1946).
40 S.E.2d 614 (State v. . Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
266 S.E.2d 700 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)