State v. . Martin

155 S.E. 447, 199 N.C. 636, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 202
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 29, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The defendant was indicted under one statute and convicted under another. The two are not the same. There is a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof. S. v. Corpening, 191 N. C., 751, 133 S. E., 14. The Attorney-General confesses error. The demurrer to the evidence will be sustained here as provided by C. S., 4643.

Eeversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Martin, 155 S.E. 447, 199 N.C. 636, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 202 (N.C. 1930).

155 S.E. 447 (State v. . Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Jackson
11 S.E.2d 149 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)