State v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Martin

464 S.W.3d 271, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2015 WL 3759442

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 102 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 2015·No. No. ED 101426·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Lee Martin appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of six counts of first-degree child molestation, two counts of victim tampering, and three counts of third-degree assault. -.We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We ■ have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Lee Martin appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of six counts of first-degree child molestation, two counts of victim tampering, and three counts of third-degree assault. -.We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We ■ have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Martin, 464 S.W.3d 271, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 652, 2015 WL 3759442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

464 S.W.3d 271 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.