State v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Martin

921 S.W.2d 150, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 786

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 7, 1996

DocketNos. 65241, 67780

StatusPublished

This text of 921 S.W.2d 150 (State v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Martin, 921 S.W.2d 150, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 786 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RMSo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior drug offender to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[151]*151The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jury found defendant guilty of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RMSo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior drug offender to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[151]*151The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 S.W.2d 150, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martin-moctapp-1996.