State v. Martin
59 So. 7, 102 Miss. 165
Opinion
It was manifest error on the part of the court below not to allow the state to reopen the case and prove the venue.
The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and the action of the court below is hereby declared erroneous.
Case reopened.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Martin, 59 So. 7, 102 Miss. 165 (Mich. 1912).
59 So. 7 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ridgeway v. State
148 So. 2d 513 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Rogers v. State
76 So. 2d 831 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
People v. District Court of Arecibo
40 P.R. 826 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1930)
Pueblo v. Corte de Distrito de Arecibo
40 P.R. Dec. 861 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1930)
Richardson v. State
121 So. 284 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
State v. Brown
211 P. 60 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1922)