State v. Martin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Martin

119 A. 924, 122 Me. 552, 1923 Me. LEXIS 229

DecidedJanuary 15, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A. 924 (State v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Martin, 119 A. 924, 122 Me. 552, 1923 Me. LEXIS 229 (Me. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Complaint for search and seizure of intoxicating liquors. After verdict of guilty the case [553]*553is before the Law Court on respondent’s exceptions to the ruling of the presiding Justice declining to order a verdict for the respondent. Held:

Edward S. Titcomb, County Attorney, for the State. John P. Deering, for respondent.

That upon the evidence for the State, supplemented by the circumstances and the rather improbable story of the respondent, the jury were warranted in believing as they declared, that the respondent was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Complaint for search and seizure of intoxicating liquors. After verdict of guilty the case [553]*553is before the Law Court on respondent’s exceptions to the ruling of the presiding Justice declining to order a verdict for the respondent. Held:

Edward S. Titcomb, County Attorney, for the State. John P. Deering, for respondent.

That upon the evidence for the State, supplemented by the circumstances and the rather improbable story of the respondent, the jury were warranted in believing as they declared, that the respondent was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A. 924, 122 Me. 552, 1923 Me. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martin-me-1923.