State v. Martin

158 A.3d 448, 172 Conn. App. 904, 2017 WL 1731197, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 159
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMay 2, 2017
DocketNo. 38611
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 A.3d 448 (State v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Martin, 158 A.3d 448, 172 Conn. App. 904, 2017 WL 1731197, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 159 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the trial court's dismissal of the motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed. See State v. Delgado, 323 Conn. 801, 151 A.3d 345 (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rivera
172 A.3d 260 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.3d 448, 172 Conn. App. 904, 2017 WL 1731197, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-martin-connappct-2017.