State v. Martin

158 A.3d 448, 172 Conn. App. 904, 2017 WL 1731197, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 159
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided May 2, 2017·No. No. 38611·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the trial court's dismissal of the motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed. See State v. Delgado, 323 Conn. 801, 151 A.3d 345 (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Martin, 158 A.3d 448, 172 Conn. App. 904, 2017 WL 1731197, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 159 (Colo. Ct. App. 2017).

158 A.3d 448 (State v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rivera
172 A.3d 260 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)